NFL Trade Value Chart — Week 5 2026 + Free Trade Calculator
Who this is for: For the manager staring at a trade offer at 11pm: is 2-for-1 fair? Chart both sides in points, see the net, and negotiate from a number instead of a vibe.
Week 5 2026 fantasy trade value chart: 60 players on a 0–99 editorial scale, four tiers, weekly trend arrows — plus a two-sided trade calculator that prices any 1-for-1 or 2-for-2 offer instantly.
Quick answer: A trade value chart prices every fantasy player on one 0–99 scale so any offer becomes arithmetic: sum both sides, read the net. This Week 5 2026 edition ranks 60 players in four tiers with weekly trend arrows, and the built-in calculator verdicts any 1-for-1 or 2-for-2 offer instantly — loaded example: Robinson + Brown 154 for Lamb + Harrison 158 = +4 buy-side lean.
Trade value calculator
The full Week 5 chart (60 players)
| # | Player | Pos | Team | Value | Tier | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Josh Allen | QB | BUF | 99 | Elite | ↑ |
| 2 | Ja'Marr Chase | WR | CIN | 98 | Elite | — |
| 3 | Lamar Jackson | QB | BAL | 97 | Elite | — |
| 4 | Bijan Robinson | RB | ATL | 96 | Elite | ↑ |
| 5 | Justin Jefferson | WR | MIN | 96 | Elite | — |
| 6 | Jahmyr Gibbs | RB | DET | 95 | Elite | ↑ |
| 7 | Jayden Daniels | QB | WAS | 92 | Elite | ↑ |
| 8 | Puka Nacua | WR | LAR | 92 | Elite | ↑ |
| 9 | Amon-Ra St. Brown | WR | DET | 91 | Elite | ↑ |
| 10 | Jonathan Taylor | RB | IND | 90 | Elite | ↑ |
| 11 | CeeDee Lamb | WR | DAL | 90 | Elite | — |
| 12 | Saquon Barkley | RB | PHI | 89 | Star | — |
| 13 | Patrick Mahomes | QB | KC | 88 | Star | ↓ |
| 14 | De'Von Achane | RB | MIA | 88 | Star | ↑ |
| 15 | Jalen Hurts | QB | PHI | 86 | Star | — |
| 16 | Malik Nabers | WR | NYG | 86 | Star | — |
| 17 | Brock Bowers | TE | LV | 86 | Star | ↑ |
| 18 | Joe Burrow | QB | CIN | 84 | Star | ↓ |
| 19 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba | WR | SEA | 84 | Star | ↑ |
| 20 | Trey McBride | TE | ARI | 84 | Star | ↑ |
| 21 | Justin Herbert | QB | LAC | 83 | Star | ↑ |
| 22 | Christian McCaffrey | RB | SF | 82 | Star | ↓ |
| 23 | Nico Collins | WR | HOU | 82 | Star | — |
| 24 | Drake London | WR | ATL | 80 | Star | ↑ |
| 25 | Baker Mayfield | QB | TB | 78 | Star | ↑ |
| 26 | A.J. Brown | WR | PHI | 78 | Star | ↓ |
| 27 | Derrick Henry | RB | BAL | 76 | Star | ↓ |
| 28 | James Cook | RB | BUF | 76 | Star | ↑ |
| 29 | Josh Jacobs | RB | GB | 75 | Star | — |
| 30 | Bo Nix | QB | DEN | 74 | Solid | ↑ |
| 31 | Bucky Irving | RB | TB | 74 | Solid | ↑ |
| 32 | Brian Thomas Jr. | WR | JAX | 74 | Solid | ↓ |
| 33 | George Kittle | TE | SF | 74 | Solid | — |
| 34 | Kyren Williams | RB | LAR | 72 | Solid | — |
| 35 | Emeka Egbuka | WR | TB | 72 | Solid | ↑ |
| 36 | Sam LaPorta | TE | DET | 72 | Solid | ↓ |
| 37 | Jordan Love | QB | GB | 71 | Solid | — |
| 38 | Garrett Wilson | WR | NYJ | 71 | Solid | — |
| 39 | Dak Prescott | QB | DAL | 70 | Solid | — |
| 40 | DK Metcalf | WR | PIT | 70 | Solid | — |
| 41 | Zay Flowers | WR | BAL | 69 | Solid | — |
| 42 | Marvin Harrison Jr. | WR | ARI | 68 | Solid | ↑ |
| 43 | Drake Maye | QB | NE | 66 | Solid | ↑ |
| 44 | Caleb Williams | QB | CHI | 64 | Solid | ↑ |
| 45 | Tee Higgins | WR | CIN | 64 | Solid | — |
| 46 | Kenneth Walker III | RB | SEA | 63 | Solid | — |
| 47 | Breece Hall | RB | NYJ | 62 | Solid | ↓ |
| 48 | Rome Odunze | WR | CHI | 62 | Solid | ↑ |
| 49 | Terry McLaurin | WR | WAS | 62 | Solid | ↓ |
| 50 | Tyreek Hill | WR | MIA | 60 | Solid | ↓ |
| 51 | Dalton Kincaid | TE | BUF | 60 | Solid | ↑ |
| 52 | Trevor Lawrence | QB | JAX | 58 | Solid | ↓ |
| 53 | Chase Brown | RB | CIN | 58 | Solid | ↑ |
| 54 | Travis Kelce | TE | KC | 58 | Solid | ↓ |
| 55 | Trey Benson | RB | ARI | 56 | Solid | ↑ |
| 56 | T.J. Hockenson | TE | MIN | 55 | Solid | ↓ |
| 57 | Mark Andrews | TE | BAL | 54 | Flex | ↓ |
| 58 | Alvin Kamara | RB | NO | 50 | Flex | ↓ |
| 59 | Rhamondre Stevenson | RB | NE | 48 | Flex | ↓ |
| 60 | Isiah Pacheco | RB | KC | 45 | Flex | ↓ |
Tiers: Elite 90+ · Star 75–89 · Solid 55–74 · Flex 20–54. Trend compares Week 5 to Week 4 editorial values.
| Edition | Week 5 · 2026 season · updated October 6, 2026 · re-priced weekly |
|---|---|
| Scale | 0–99 editorial values · Elite 90+ / Star 75–89 / Solid 55–74 / Flex 20–54 |
| Coverage | 60 players (QB/RB/WR/TE) · trend arrow per player (Week 4 → 5) |
| Calculator | Two-sided, up to 2 players + qty each side · net, % lean, verdict at ±2% band |
| Example verdict | Robinson + Brown (154) for Lamb + Harrison Jr. (158) → +4 (+2.6%) buy-side lean |
| Honest limit | Editorial opinion, not projections — pair with news; picks not covered |
How a trade value chart works
A trade value chart converts every player to one number on a 0–99 scale so any offer becomes simple arithmetic: sum the values you send, sum the values you receive, and read the net. That sounds crude, and it is — deliberately. The chart is an editorial opinion updated weekly (this one after Week 5 of the 2026 season, on October 6, 2026), built for negotiation, not prophecy: Josh Allen tops it at 99, 11 players sit in the Elite 90+ tier, and every entry carries a Week 4-to-5 trend arrow so you can see which way the market is drifting.
The calculator on this page does the arithmetic for you: pick up to two players per side with quantities, and it prints both sides' totals, the net, a percentage lean, and a verdict — fair, buy-side, or sell-side — using a deliberately tight ±2% band. Worked example from the loaded default: Bijan Robinson + Chase Brown (154) for CeeDee Lamb + Marvin Harrison Jr. (158) nets +4 (+2.6%) — a buy-side lean by chart math, and exactly the kind of marginal call the band is designed to flag rather than hide.
Common uses
- Verdict a 2-for-2 offer in ten seconds before you counter
- Finding buy-low windows: Solid-tier players with up arrows (rising market, patient seller)
- Pricing the 'plus' in a 2-for-1: how much filler makes the math honest?
- Keeping league-mates honest — answer a rip-off offer with a chart number, not an argument
Why a 0–99 scale instead of 'first-round picks'
Classic pick-value charts map players to draft capital, which works at the draft but wobbles in-season: a third-round keeper pick and a hot waiver add are not the same currency mid-year. A flat 0–99 scale keeps every comparison in one unit, and the tier bands (Elite 90+, Star 75–89, Solid 55–74, Flex 20–54) restore the fuzziness that honest trade talk needs. When both sides of a deal land in the same tier, the chart is telling you the trade is a preference call, not a math call.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this trade value chart updated every week?
How is this different from Rotowire's trade value chart?
What do the tiers mean?
Why did my trade show 'fair' when it obviously isn't?
Can I value draft picks with this chart?
Do values account for injuries and byes?
More guides
The honest beginner's path: cash vs GPP, the value multiplier, why 50/50s teach more than milly makers, and the bankroll rules nobody enjoys reading.
An honest comparison: what Rotowire's NFL optimizer actually gives you for the subscription, which free alternatives exist, and when free is the right call.
More Research tools
Turn any salary + projection into points per $1,000, the points needed at your target multiplier, and a surplus/deficit verdict.
Split the $50,000 DraftKings or $60,000 FanDuel cap across roster slots with normalized weights — see each slot's budget and implied points.
Pick a team and get its QB + pass-catcher combos ranked — combined salary, projection and value per $1k, plus the bring-back play.
Monte-Carlo simulate any 9-man lineup: floor (P5), median, ceiling (P95) and the odds of clearing your target score — deterministic and instant.